| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:10:20 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Michael Dalton <mwdalton@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] virtio-net: auto-tune mergeable rx buffer
size for improved performance
On 11/13/2013 06:21 AM, Michael Dalton wrote:
> Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag
> allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to
> MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large
> average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all workloads.
> For workloads with packet size <= MTU bytes, MTU + virtio-net header-sized
> buffers are preferred as larger buffers reduce the TCP window due to SKB
> truesize. However, single-stream workloads with large average packet sizes
> have higher throughput if larger (e.g., PAGE_SIZE) buffers are used.
>
> This commit auto-tunes the mergeable receiver buffer packet size by choosing
> the packet buffer size based on an EWMA of the recent packet sizes for the
> receive queue. Packet buffer sizes range from MTU_SIZE + virtio-net header
> len to PAGE_SIZE. This improves throughput for large packet workloads, as
> any workload with average packet size >= PAGE_SIZE will use PAGE_SIZE
> buffers.
Hi Michael:
There's one concern with EWMA. How well does it handle multiple streams
each with different packet size? E.g there may be two flows, one with
256 bytes each packet another is 64K. Looks like it can result we
allocate PAGE_SIZE buffer for 256 (which is bad since the
payload/truesize is low) bytes or 1500+ for 64K buffer (which is ok
since we can do coalescing).
>
> These optimizations interact positively with recent commit
> ba275241030c ("virtio-net: coalesce rx frags when possible during rx"),
> which coalesces adjacent RX SKB fragments in virtio_net. The coalescing
> optimizations benefit buffers of any size.
>
> Benchmarks taken from an average of 5 netperf 30-second TCP_STREAM runs
> between two QEMU VMs on a single physical machine. Each VM has two VCPUs
> with all offloads & vhost enabled. All VMs and vhost threads run in a
> single 4 CPU cgroup cpuset, using cgroups to ensure that other processes
> in the system will not be scheduled on the benchmark CPUs. Trunk includes
> SKB rx frag coalescing.
>
> net-next trunk w/ virtio_net before 2613af0ed18a (PAGE_SIZE bufs): 14642.85Gb/s
> net-next trunk (MTU-size bufs): 13170.01Gb/s
> net-next trunk + auto-tune: 14555.94Gb/s
Do you have perf numbers that just without this patch? We need to know
how much EWMA help exactly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Dalton <mwdalton@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 0c93054..b1086e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> #include <linux/if_vlan.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/average.h>
>
> static int napi_weight = NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT;
> module_param(napi_weight, int, 0444);
> @@ -37,10 +38,8 @@ module_param(gso, bool, 0444);
>
> /* FIXME: MTU in config. */
> #define GOOD_PACKET_LEN (ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN + ETH_DATA_LEN)
> -#define MERGE_BUFFER_LEN (ALIGN(GOOD_PACKET_LEN + \
> - sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf), \
> - L1_CACHE_BYTES))
> #define GOOD_COPY_LEN 128
> +#define RECEIVE_AVG_WEIGHT 64
Maybe we can make this as a module parameter.
>
> #define VIRTNET_DRIVER_VERSION "1.0.0"
>
> @@ -79,6 +78,9 @@ struct receive_queue {
> /* Chain pages by the private ptr. */
> struct page *pages;
>
> + /* Average packet length for mergeable receive buffers. */
> + struct ewma mrg_avg_pkt_len;
> +
> /* Page frag for GFP_ATOMIC packet buffer allocation. */
> struct page_frag atomic_frag;
>
> @@ -302,14 +304,17 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct receive_queue *rq,
> return skb;
> }
>
> -static int receive_mergeable(struct receive_queue *rq, struct sk_buff *head_skb)
> +static int receive_mergeable(struct receive_queue *rq, struct sk_buff *head_skb,
> + struct page *head_page)
> {
> struct skb_vnet_hdr *hdr = skb_vnet_hdr(head_skb);
> struct sk_buff *curr_skb = head_skb;
> + struct page *page = head_page;
> char *buf;
> - struct page *page;
> - int num_buf, len, offset, truesize;
> + int num_buf, len, offset;
> + u32 est_buffer_len;
>
> + len = head_skb->len;
> num_buf = hdr->mhdr.num_buffers;
> while (--num_buf) {
> int num_skb_frags = skb_shinfo(curr_skb)->nr_frags;
> @@ -320,7 +325,6 @@ static int receive_mergeable(struct receive_queue *rq, struct sk_buff *head_skb)
> head_skb->dev->stats.rx_length_errors++;
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - truesize = max_t(int, len, MERGE_BUFFER_LEN);
> if (unlikely(num_skb_frags == MAX_SKB_FRAGS)) {
> struct sk_buff *nskb = alloc_skb(0, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (unlikely(!nskb)) {
> @@ -338,20 +342,38 @@ static int receive_mergeable(struct receive_queue *rq, struct sk_buff *head_skb)
> if (curr_skb != head_skb) {
> head_skb->data_len += len;
> head_skb->len += len;
> - head_skb->truesize += truesize;
> + head_skb->truesize += len;
> }
> page = virt_to_head_page(buf);
> offset = buf - (char *)page_address(page);
> if (skb_can_coalesce(curr_skb, num_skb_frags, page, offset)) {
> put_page(page);
> skb_coalesce_rx_frag(curr_skb, num_skb_frags - 1,
> - len, truesize);
> + len, len);
> } else {
> skb_add_rx_frag(curr_skb, num_skb_frags, page,
> - offset, len, truesize);
> + offset, len, len);
> }
> --rq->num;
> }
> + /* All frags before the last frag are fully used -- for those frags,
> + * truesize = len. Use the size of the most recent buffer allocation
> + * from the last frag's page to estimate the truesize of the last frag.
> + * EWMA with a weight of 64 makes the size adjustments quite small in
> + * the frags allocated on one page (even a order-3 one), and truesize
> + * doesn't need to be 100% accurate.
> + */
> + if (page) {
> + est_buffer_len = page_private(page);
> + if (est_buffer_len > len) {
> + u32 truesize_delta = est_buffer_len - len;
> +
> + curr_skb->truesize += truesize_delta;
> + if (curr_skb != head_skb)
> + head_skb->truesize += truesize_delta;
> + }
Is there a chance that est_buffer_len was smaller than or equal with len?
> + }
> + ewma_add(&rq->mrg_avg_pkt_len, head_skb->len);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -382,16 +404,21 @@ static void receive_buf(struct receive_queue *rq, void *buf, unsigned int len)
> skb_trim(skb, len);
> } else if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs) {
> struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(buf);
> - int truesize = max_t(int, len, MERGE_BUFFER_LEN);
> + /* Use an initial truesize of 'len' bytes for page_to_skb --
> + * receive_mergeable will fixup the truesize of the last page
> + * frag if the packet is non-linear (> GOOD_COPY_LEN bytes).
> + */
> skb = page_to_skb(rq, page,
> (char *)buf - (char *)page_address(page),
> - len, truesize);
> + len, len);
> if (unlikely(!skb)) {
> dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> put_page(page);
> return;
> }
> - if (receive_mergeable(rq, skb)) {
> + if (!skb_is_nonlinear(skb))
> + page = NULL;
> + if (receive_mergeable(rq, skb, page)) {
> dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> return;
> }
> @@ -540,24 +567,29 @@ static int add_recvbuf_big(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp)
> static int add_recvbuf_mergeable(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp)
> {
> struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> + const size_t hdr_len = sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf);
> struct page_frag *alloc_frag;
> char *buf;
> - int err, len, hole;
> + int err, hole;
> + u32 buflen;
>
> + buflen = hdr_len + clamp_t(u32, ewma_read(&rq->mrg_avg_pkt_len),
> + GOOD_PACKET_LEN, PAGE_SIZE - hdr_len);
> + buflen = ALIGN(buflen, L1_CACHE_BYTES);
> alloc_frag = (gfp & __GFP_WAIT) ? &vi->sleep_frag : &rq->atomic_frag;
> - if (unlikely(!skb_page_frag_refill(MERGE_BUFFER_LEN, alloc_frag, gfp)))
> + if (unlikely(!skb_page_frag_refill(buflen, alloc_frag, gfp)))
> return -ENOMEM;
> buf = (char *)page_address(alloc_frag->page) + alloc_frag->offset;
> get_page(alloc_frag->page);
> - len = MERGE_BUFFER_LEN;
> - alloc_frag->offset += len;
> + alloc_frag->offset += buflen;
> + set_page_private(alloc_frag->page, buflen);
Not sure this is accurate, since buflen may change and several frags may
share a single page. So the est_buffer_len we get in receive_mergeable()
may not be the correct value.
> hole = alloc_frag->size - alloc_frag->offset;
> - if (hole < MERGE_BUFFER_LEN) {
> - len += hole;
> + if (hole < buflen) {
> + buflen += hole;
> alloc_frag->offset += hole;
> }
>
> - sg_init_one(rq->sg, buf, len);
> + sg_init_one(rq->sg, buf, buflen);
> err = virtqueue_add_inbuf(rq->vq, rq->sg, 1, buf, gfp);
> if (err < 0)
> put_page(virt_to_head_page(buf));
> @@ -1475,6 +1507,7 @@ static int virtnet_alloc_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> napi_weight);
>
> sg_init_table(vi->rq[i].sg, ARRAY_SIZE(vi->rq[i].sg));
> + ewma_init(&vi->rq[i].mrg_avg_pkt_len, 1, RECEIVE_AVG_WEIGHT);
> sg_init_table(vi->sq[i].sg, ARRAY_SIZE(vi->sq[i].sg));
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists