netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert "af-packet: Use existing netdev reference for bound sockets"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:00:53 +0100
From:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To:	Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...stanetworks.com>
CC:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
	Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert "af-packet: Use existing netdev reference
 for bound sockets"

On 11/18/2013 08:40 AM, Salam Noureddine wrote:
> This reverts commit 827d978037d7d0bf0860481948c6d26ead10042f
> ("af-packet: Use existing netdev reference for bound sockets")
>
> The patch introduced a race condition between packet_snd and
> packet_notifier when a net_device is being unregistered. In the case of
> a bound socket, packet_notifier can drop the last reference to the
> net_device and packet_snd might end up sending a packet over a freed
> net_device.

So there's no other workaround possible like e.g. setting a flag in
struct packet_sock so that in case our netdevice goes down, we just
set the flag and if set, we return with -ENXIO in send path?
Reverting this would decrease performance for everyone as we would
then do the lookup every time we send a packet again.

> Signed-off-by: Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...stanetworks.com>
> ---
>   net/packet/af_packet.c |   26 +++++++++++---------------
>   1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> index 2e8286b..34fe9eb 100644
> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> @@ -2057,8 +2057,7 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg)
>   	struct sk_buff *skb;
>   	struct net_device *dev;
>   	__be16 proto;
> -	bool need_rls_dev = false;
> -	int err, reserve = 0;
> +	int ifindex, err, reserve = 0;
>   	void *ph;
>   	struct sockaddr_ll *saddr = (struct sockaddr_ll *)msg->msg_name;
>   	int tp_len, size_max;
> @@ -2070,7 +2069,7 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg)
>   	mutex_lock(&po->pg_vec_lock);
>
>   	if (saddr == NULL) {
> -		dev = po->prot_hook.dev;
> +		ifindex	= po->ifindex;
>   		proto	= po->num;
>   		addr	= NULL;
>   	} else {
> @@ -2081,12 +2080,12 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg)
>   					+ offsetof(struct sockaddr_ll,
>   						sll_addr)))
>   			goto out;
> +		ifindex	= saddr->sll_ifindex;
>   		proto	= saddr->sll_protocol;
>   		addr	= saddr->sll_addr;
> -		dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(&po->sk), saddr->sll_ifindex);
> -		need_rls_dev = true;
>   	}
>
> +	dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(&po->sk), ifindex);
>   	err = -ENXIO;
>   	if (unlikely(dev == NULL))
>   		goto out;
> @@ -2173,8 +2172,7 @@ out_status:
>   	__packet_set_status(po, ph, status);
>   	kfree_skb(skb);
>   out_put:
> -	if (need_rls_dev)
> -		dev_put(dev);
> +	dev_put(dev);
>   out:
>   	mutex_unlock(&po->pg_vec_lock);
>   	return err;
> @@ -2212,9 +2210,8 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *sock,
>   	struct sk_buff *skb;
>   	struct net_device *dev;
>   	__be16 proto;
> -	bool need_rls_dev = false;
>   	unsigned char *addr;
> -	int err, reserve = 0;
> +	int ifindex, err, reserve = 0;
>   	struct virtio_net_hdr vnet_hdr = { 0 };
>   	int offset = 0;
>   	int vnet_hdr_len;
> @@ -2228,7 +2225,7 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *sock,
>   	 */
>
>   	if (saddr == NULL) {
> -		dev = po->prot_hook.dev;
> +		ifindex	= po->ifindex;
>   		proto	= po->num;
>   		addr	= NULL;
>   	} else {
> @@ -2237,12 +2234,12 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *sock,
>   			goto out;
>   		if (msg->msg_namelen < (saddr->sll_halen + offsetof(struct sockaddr_ll, sll_addr)))
>   			goto out;
> +		ifindex	= saddr->sll_ifindex;
>   		proto	= saddr->sll_protocol;
>   		addr	= saddr->sll_addr;
> -		dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), saddr->sll_ifindex);
> -		need_rls_dev = true;
>   	}
>
> +	dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ifindex);
>   	err = -ENXIO;
>   	if (dev == NULL)
>   		goto out_unlock;
> @@ -2386,15 +2383,14 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *sock,
>   	if (err > 0 && (err = net_xmit_errno(err)) != 0)
>   		goto out_unlock;
>
> -	if (need_rls_dev)
> -		dev_put(dev);
> +	dev_put(dev);
>
>   	return len;
>
>   out_free:
>   	kfree_skb(skb);
>   out_unlock:
> -	if (dev && need_rls_dev)
> +	if (dev)
>   		dev_put(dev);
>   out:
>   	return err;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html