netdev - Re: [OOPS][3.12] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 23 Nov 2013 23:10:19 +0200
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, pomac@...ius.net,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com, pomac@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, alex.aring@...il.com,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OOPS][3.12] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
 dereference at 0000000c

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:22:55AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 06:57:55PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Ian Kumlien <pomac@...ius.net>
> > Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 00:39:19 +0100
> > 
> > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 05:44:26PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > >> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> > >> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:29:53 -0700
> > >> 
> > >> > [+cc David, Eric, Alex, netdev]
> > >> > 
> > >> > Alex reported a similar issue at
> > >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=138355719901790&w=4
> > >> 
> > >> Fixed by:
> > >> 
> > >> commit 84502b5ef9849a9694673b15c31bd3ac693010ae
> > >> Author: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> > >> Date:   Wed Oct 30 11:16:28 2013 +0100
> > > 
> > > Cherry-picked, compiled and preparing for reboot - thanks!
> > > 
> > > Shouldn't this be queued up in stable sometime soonish?
> > > 
> > > (Sorry for the change of email address, i had forgot to switch the
> > > configurations in mutt)
> > 
> > Steffen is in charge of IPSEC -stable submissions, please ask him
> > :-)
> 
> It was intended for v3.12 but the release came before it was merged
> into the manline. So yes, it should go to the v3.12 stable tree.
> 
> I've always did stable submissions just by marking them as a
> candidate for stable, this did not happen here because I hoped
> it will make it into v3.12. It should apply cleanly to v3.12
> stable, you could just pick it into you stable queue, or
> alternatively I can submit to stable.

Any progress with getting the patch into stable?

It's not in v3.12.1 and I don't see it in stable queue.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html