netdev - Re: [PATCH v4] sctp: check the rto_min and rto

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:36:45 +0800
From:	Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
CC:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sctp: check the rto_min and rto_max

On 2013/12/6 17:50, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 09:48 AM, Wang Weidong wrote:
> 
>> Should I define it in net/sctp/sctp.h, so sysctl.c can use it as well.
>> Or I just define it in the socket.c same as the definition in sysctl.c?
> 
> Preferably in include/net/sctp/constants.h where we already have most
> other constants anyway.
> 
> 
Hi Daniel,

in sysctl.c it will use a point to the value while the socket.c use the value.
So if I define macros SCTP_ONE or SCTP_TIMER_MAX in include/net/sctp/constants.h
which only used by socket.c. Is it OK?

Regards.
Wang

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html