[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:28:01 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: raspl@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: stephen@...workplumber.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
blaschka@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Display adjacent switch port's attributes
From: Stefan Raspl <raspl@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:57:18 +0100
> I agree, netlink would certainly be nice. But ethtool is the
> de-facto standard for now, and there doesn't seem to be a
> netlink-based alternative in sight - or is there?
> Offering a netlink based tool seems to be a different discussion,
> and if that takes shape, existing ethtool functionality (including
> this series) can and should be migrated.
I completely disagree, ethtool is not de-facto for anything in
particular. It's suitable for some things, not suitable for
others.
And just because it's used for other aspects of a device's
configuration doesn't mean that netlink isn't appropriate for other
apsects.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists