[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 02:26:36 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mkubecek@...e.cz, jbenc@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ipv6: router reachability probing
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 07:56:51PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:12:36 +0100
>
> > Is it really the case in current mainline kernels? In my tests, this
> > behaviour in 3.0 kernel (SLES 11 SP3) was caused by the reference held
> > by struct dst_entry which caused that in neigh_periodic_work(),
> > n->refcnt was always bigger than one so that the neighbour entry was
> > never cleaned up. But when I tested with 3.11.6 (OpenSuSE 13.1) where
> > neighbour is no longer cached in struct dst_entry, the neighbour was
> > cleaned up eventually and new lookup was performed.
>
> The detachment of neighbours from route entires has had many consequences,
> both desirable and undesirable. This happens to be one of the former,
> fortunately :-)
In the end it was worth it. It fixed some very annoying bugs.
But while I wrote the previouss answer I noticed that we should actually
move the state of the probes from neigh->update to the rt6_info structure
as we cannot guarantee it will survive the 60 seconds in failed state. :/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists