netdev - Re: [PATCHv4 net-next] xfrm: Namespacify xfrm_policy_sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Dec 2013 12:54:11 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	fan.du@...driver.com
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
	steffen.klassert@...unet.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next] xfrm: Namespacify xfrm_policy_sk_bundles

From: Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:39:45 +0800

> 
> 
> On 2013年12月24日 13:31, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Fan Du<fan.du@...driver.com>
>> Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 09:12:32 +0800
>>
>>> >  I saw this patch is marked 'Not Applicable' in patchwork.
>> It means that it doesn't go in via my tree directly, it
>> "doesn't apply".
>>
>> Instead, it goes into Steffen's IPSEC tree.
>>
> 
> Thanks for your explanation!!!
> 
> I'm not well understand the curtsy about patchwork, and one last
> question,
> [PATCHv4 net-next 0/8] pktgen IPsec support is tagged as 'Awaiting
> Upstream'
> what does that mean and do I need to take further action about this
> patch set?

It means the same thing, that I expect to receive this change via
upstream, which is Steffen's IPSEC tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html