netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] ipv6 addrconf:fix preferred lifetime state-changing behavior while valid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 29 Dec 2013 21:04:27 +0900
From:	Yasushi Asano <yazzep@...il.com>
To:	netdev Mailing List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ipv6 addrconf:fix preferred lifetime state-changing behavior while valid_lft is infinity

> 
> Ditto, I do think we cannot remove this flag unconditionally.
> 
> Actually, I don't think it is the correct way to remove the IFA_F_PERMANENT
> here at all. We break the interaction with prefix routes and won't remove them
> at the time of address deletion any more. This is definitely a no-go, sorry.
> 
> The prefix was added by hand and should get removed immediately if a user
> removes the address (well actually it is an error we set up a prefix route in
> the first place, but it is how things are now).
> 
> IMHO, the changes need to be made in addrconf_verify so that the route does
> get marked as deprecated. Please check the places where we mark an interface
> address as deprecated.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  Hannes

Sorry about not getting back to you sooner.
I have been thinking and testing about the correct way of fixing the problem.
I understand it's not the correct way to remove the IFA_F_PERMANENT.
I agree with you that the changes need to be made in addrconf_verify.
and I think changes also need to be made in inet6_fill_ifaddr
so that the "preferred" is set INFINITY_LIFE_TIME unconditionally while ifa->flags is IFA_F_PERMANENT.
It means, "preferred" is set to INFINITY_LIFE_TIME when I set preferred_lft a value not zero or infinity, while valid_lft is infinity(0xffffffff)
I sent a new patch to netdev-ml today.
Your kind consideration of this matter would be sincerely appreciated.

Yasushi--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html