netdev - Fw: [Bug 68011] New: spin_unlock is missed in function (netpoll_send_skb_on_dev) in file (linux-3.12/net/core/netpoll.c)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Jan 2014 21:52:31 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: [Bug 68011] New: spin_unlock is missed in function
 (netpoll_send_skb_on_dev) in file (linux-3.12/net/core/netpoll.c)



Begin forwarded message:

Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 11:52:20 -0800
From: "bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org" <bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org>
To: "stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: [Bug 68011] New: spin_unlock is missed in function (netpoll_send_skb_on_dev) in file (linux-3.12/net/core/netpoll.c)


https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68011

            Bug ID: 68011
           Summary: spin_unlock is missed in function
                    (netpoll_send_skb_on_dev) in file
                    (linux-3.12/net/core/netpoll.c)
           Product: Networking
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: 3.12
          Hardware: x86-64
                OS: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: Other
          Assignee: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
          Reporter: atamrawi@...tate.edu
        Regression: No

In function (netpoll_send_skb_on_dev) in file (linux-3.12/net/core/netpoll.c):

The structure (txq->_xmit_lock) gets successfully locked at line (383) by
(__netif_tx_trylock(txq)) and unlocked by (__netif_tx_unlock(txq)) at line
(398).

The problem occurs when the loop breaks at line (390) and the structure
(txq->_xmit_lock) still locked. In that case, the structure (txq->_xmit_lock)
never gets unlocked.

A possible solution is to call (__netif_tx_unlock(txq)) before the break at
line (390)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html