netdev - Re: [net-next] pci_regs.h: Add PCI bus link speed and width defines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 03 Jan 2014 17:27:39 -0800
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	bhelgaas@...gle.com, jesse.brandeburg@...il.com,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bjorn.helgaas@...com
Subject: Re: [net-next] pci_regs.h: Add PCI bus link speed and width defines

On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 19:30 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:00:42 -0700
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 4:56 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> >> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> >> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 15:15:57 -0700
> >>
> >>> However, I do raise my eyebrows a bit at drivers that poke around in
> >>> the PCIe capability.  I would prefer to have PCI core interfaces that
> >>> handle that instead.  But I haven't seen Jeff's changes yet.
> >>
> >> The changes just read the link status to interpret the speed at which
> >> the PCI-E link is running at.
> > 
> > Several drivers want to do that.  It'd be nice if somebody abstracted
> > that out somehow.  Jacob added pcie_get_minimum_link() which is
> > similar.  But maybe Jeff needs something more in this case.
> > 
> > In any case, it's not a blocker for this patch.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> Jeff, please merge this via the Intel submission process and don't forget
> to add Bjorn's ACK.
> 
> Thanks.

Ok, will do.  What do you want to do with the current series of patches
(mainly the ixgbe LER patches) on my tree?  I know that there is a
thread going on between Joe Perches and Mark, but it sounded like Mark
is working on a follow-on patch to address Joe's concerns.

Guess I want to know if I leave my tree alone for you to pull or toss
the current pull request series and get the i40e series applied.

Cheers,
Jeff

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)