netdev - Re: inconsistency of ethtool feature names for get vs. set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Jan 2014 20:39:04 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
CC:	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: inconsistency of ethtool feature names for get vs. set

On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 22:12 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> 
> > Just to be clear, I do see that there's a problem here but the fix may
> > have to be mostly or entirely in documentation rather than code.
> 
> Ben, I am fine with at least starting with documenting this and see
> where it takes us, can you pick it up?

I might do but don't assume I will.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html