netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] ipv4: introduce ip_dst_mtu_secure and protect forwarding path against pmtu spoofing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Jan 2014 01:11:03 +0100
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	johnwheffner@...il.com, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
	fweimer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] ipv4: introduce ip_dst_mtu_secure and protect forwarding path against pmtu spoofing

On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:08:46PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 09:48:27 +0100
> 
> > I want to put these patches up for discussion again. I did more testing
> > to them (xfrm, tunnel), did some rewording and rewrote the IPv6 patch.
> 
> I'm still thinking about this series.
> 
> I would have been nice if you provided a "0/3" introductory posting
> discussing your point of view, and giving a more detailed analysis of
> your view of the situation so that John and others have something to
> reply to.

I'll do next time, sorry.

I am around for discussion. Have you seen that Steffen did test these
patches with his pmtu testsuite successfully and they showed no obvious
regressions (he posted to the old thread)?

Thanks,

  Hannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html