netdev - Re: [net-next 05/15] i40e: add a comment on barrier and fix panic on reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 9 Jan 2014 14:16:57 -0800
From:	Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, gospo@...hat.com,
	sassmann@...hat.com, Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 05/15] i40e: add a comment on barrier and fix panic on reset


On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:52 AM, Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> wrote:

> From: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> index ea76134..5cdc67c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ void i40e_vsi_reset_stats(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
> 	memset(&vsi->net_stats_offsets, 0, sizeof(vsi->net_stats_offsets));
> 	memset(&vsi->eth_stats, 0, sizeof(vsi->eth_stats));
> 	memset(&vsi->eth_stats_offsets, 0, sizeof(vsi->eth_stats_offsets));
> -	if (vsi->rx_rings)
> +	if (vsi->rx_rings && vsi->rx_rings[0]) {

Any reason why just [0] is checked for !NULL here...

> 		for (i = 0; i < vsi->num_queue_pairs; i++) {
> 			memset(&vsi->rx_rings[i]->stats, 0 ,
> 			       sizeof(vsi->rx_rings[i]->stats));
> @@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ void i40e_vsi_reset_stats(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
> 			memset(&vsi->tx_rings[i]->tx_stats, 0,
> 			       sizeof(vsi->tx_rings[i]->tx_stats));
> 		}
> +	}
> 	vsi->stat_offsets_loaded = false;
> }
> 
> @@ -2101,8 +2105,11 @@ static void i40e_vsi_free_rx_resources(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
> {
> 	int i;
> 
> +	if (!vsi->rx_rings)
> +		return;
> +
> 	for (i = 0; i < vsi->num_queue_pairs; i++)
> -		if (vsi->rx_rings[i]->desc)
> +		if (vsi->rx_rings[i] && vsi->rx_rings[i]->desc)

but here every [i] is checked for !NULL here?

> 			i40e_free_rx_resources(vsi->rx_rings[i]);
> }
> 

If [0] check is sufficient to know if array members are allocated, maybe an wrapper func would help document intent:

static bool i40e_vsi_rings_allocated(struct i40e_ring *ring)
{
	return (ring && ring[0]);
}

-scott

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html