netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] packet: use percpu mmap tx frame pending refcount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:51:48 -0800
From:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] packet: use percpu mmap tx frame pending refcount

On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com> wrote:
> +static void packet_inc_pending(struct packet_ring_buffer *rb)
> +{
> +       this_cpu_inc(*rb->pending_refcnt);
> +}
> +
> +static void packet_dec_pending(struct packet_ring_buffer *rb)
> +{
> +       this_cpu_dec(*rb->pending_refcnt);
> +}
> +
> +static int packet_read_pending(const struct packet_ring_buffer *rb)
> +{
> +       int i, refcnt = 0;
> +
> +       /* We don't use pending refcount in rx_ring. */
> +       if (rb->pending_refcnt == NULL)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> +               refcnt += *per_cpu_ptr(rb->pending_refcnt, i);
> +
> +       return refcnt;
> +}

How is this supposed to work? Since there is no lock,
you can't read accurate refcnt. Take a look at lib/percpu_counter.c.

I guess for some reason you don't care the accuracy?
Then at least you need to comment in the code.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html