netdev - Re: [Patch net-next] net_sched: act: remove headers in include/net/tc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:57:10 -0800
From:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] net_sched: act: remove headers in include/net/tc_act/

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:12 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:01:39 -0800
>
>> These headers are not necessary because those definitions in them
>> are action specific and are not shared for others. Just move them
>> into the C files.
>>
>> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>
> Like Eric, I think this is a dubious change.
>
> There is nothing wrong with using these headers to define the
> core data structures used by each of these actions modules.
>

Nothing is wrong here, just that it is not necessary.

act_police defines similar stuffs in its C file, not a header.
I don't see any reason why others can't.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html