lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:43:21 +0100
From:	Holger Eitzenberger <holger@...zenberger.org>
To:	netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	Krisztian Kovacs <hidden@....bme.hu>
Subject: [BUG PATCH RFC] Memory on tcp_prot with TPROXY and TCP early demux

Hi,

I see a memory leak when using a transparent HTTP proxy using TPROXY
together with TCP early demux and Kernel v3.8.13.15 (Ubuntu stable):

unreferenced object 0xffff88008cba4a40 (size 1696):
  comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4294944115 (age 8907.520s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    0a e0 20 6a 40 04 1b 37 92 be 32 e2 e8 b4 00 00  .. j@.....2.....
    02 00 07 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<ffffffff810b710a>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xad/0xb9
    [<ffffffff81270185>] sk_prot_alloc+0x29/0xc5
    [<ffffffff812702cf>] sk_clone_lock+0x14/0x283
    [<ffffffff812aaf3a>] inet_csk_clone_lock+0xf/0x7b
    [<ffffffff8129a893>] netlink_broadcast+0x14/0x16
    [<ffffffff812c1573>] tcp_create_openreq_child+0x1b/0x4c3
    [<ffffffff812c033e>] tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock+0x38/0x25d
    [<ffffffff812c13e4>] tcp_check_req+0x25c/0x3d0
    [<ffffffff812bf87a>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x287/0x40e
    [<ffffffff812a08a7>] ip_route_input_noref+0x843/0xa55
    [<ffffffff812bfeca>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x4c9/0x725
    [<ffffffff812a26f4>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0xe9/0x154
    [<ffffffff8127a927>] __netif_receive_skb+0x4b2/0x514
    [<ffffffff8127aa77>] process_backlog+0xee/0x1c5
    [<ffffffff8127c949>] net_rx_action+0xa7/0x200
    [<ffffffff81209d86>] add_interrupt_randomness+0x39/0x157

But I see plenty of them, resulting in the machine going OOM after
some days.

>From looking at the TPROXY code, and with help from Florian, I see that
the memory leak is introduced in tcp_v4_early_demux():

  void tcp_v4_early_demux(struct sk_buff *skb)
  {
    /* ... */

  	iph = ip_hdr(skb);
  	th = tcp_hdr(skb);
  
  	if (th->doff < sizeof(struct tcphdr) / 4)
  		return;
  
  	sk = __inet_lookup_established(dev_net(skb->dev), &tcp_hashinfo,
  				       iph->saddr, th->source,
  				       iph->daddr, ntohs(th->dest),
  				       skb->skb_iif);
  	if (sk) {
  		skb->sk = sk;

where the socket is assigned unconditionally to skb->sk, also bumping
the refcnt on it.  This is problematic, because in our case the skb
has already a socket assigned in the TPROXY target if being proxied
traffic.  This then results in the leak I see.

The very same issue seems to be with IPv6, but haven't tested.

Because this codepath is only hit with net.ipv4.ip_early_demux enabled
(default '0') disabling Early Demux prooved to be a valid workaround
for this issue.

The patch which fixes the issue for me is attached as RFC: I simply
skip Early Demux if a local socket already has been assigned
in the target.  Both for IPv4 and IPv6.  kmemleak then reports
no more leaks.

Please have a look, there may be smarter ways of fixing that.

Same issue is present in net-next and v3.13.

Thanks,

 /Holger


View attachment "fix-memleak-if-TPROXY-plus-early-demux.diff" of type "text/x-diff" (3291 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists