Date:	Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:48:57 +0100
From:	Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>
To:	Mathias Kretschmer <mathias.kretschmer@...us.fraunhofer.de>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-3.14-rc1 & PACKET_QDISC_BYPASS : slow_path warning

On 2014-02-04 15:35, Mathias Kretschmer wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 03:25 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 02/04/2014 02:13 PM, Mathias Kretschmer wrote:
>>> On 02/04/2014 01:56 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>>> On 02/03/2014 11:47 PM, Mathias Kretschmer wrote:
>> ...
>>>>> we are developing a wired/wireless MPLS switch. Currently the data plane runs in
>>>>> user space using PF_PACKET sockets via RX_RING/TX_RING.
>>>>>
>>>>> We had hoped to test the PACKET_QDISC_BYPASS option since this seems to be the
>>>>> proper optimization for our purposes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, we're seeing a 'slow path' warning for every packet that is being
>>>>> sent out. With PACKET_QDISC_BYPASS disabled, no warnings are dumped. Hardware is
>>>>> an older AMD Geode LX embedded board (ALiX).
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, this happens while sending via a wireless (802.11) adhoc interface. Hence, it
>>>>> might be an interaction with the ieee80211 sub system.
>>>>
>>>> Hm, so the WARN_ON() is triggered inside ath9k driver in relation to 802.11 QoS,
>>>> and came in from commit 066dae93bdf ("ath9k: rework tx queue selection and fix
>>>> queue stopping/waking"). We did the stress testing of that option for PF_PACKET
>>>> on 10Gbit/s NICs. Seems to me you might be running into the same issue when using
>>>> pktgen as it randomly or per round-robin selects tx queues as well? Not entirely
>>>> sure how necessary this WARN_ON() is though, Felix? I think QDISC_BYPASS might not
>>>> be the best option in your case, perhaps you will run into increased power usage
>>>> in your NIC as a side-effect?
>>>
>>> I'm not familiar with the exact implementation details, but from the description
>>> of this option, it seems to me that this is exactly what one would want to use if
>>> the goal is to send an Ethernet frame out on a particular interface without any
>>> further processing by the kernel.
>>>
>>> Why would this increase the power usage on the NIC ?  Due to a higher achievable
>>> packet rate ?  That would be acceptable :)
>>
>> I'm not too familiar with the ieee80211 sub system, so I let Felix answer side
>> effects and if actually the WARN_ON() is needed. ;) PACKET_QDISC_BYPASS is, as
>> documented, designed for advanced pktgen resp. traffic generator like scenarios
>> where you just sort of "brute force" packets to your NIC to stress test a remote
>> machine for further analysis. I don't think it's very useful in your scenario
>> when you have a wired/wireless MPLS switch, you rather might want to buffer/queue
>> and therefore use qdisc layer instead.
> 
> Hm, I was hoping/assuming that we still get to use hardware queues, if provided by 
> the driver. The main goal was to avoid any further PF_PACKET framework overhead.
> 
> If the WARN_ON() issue gets solved, we will revisit this option and evaluate its 
> applicability.
The reason for the WARN_ON is probably either the .ndo_select_queue call
is not run, or its queue selection result is changed before the frame
hits the driver's tx call.
This call sets both the queue and the TID (similar to 802.1d tag), which
makes it into the packet via 802.11e (WMM, QoS).
It is important to the driver that the TID is in sync with the queue
selection, if that is not the case, then pending frame counters can get
messed up.
If you really want to bypass qdisc, make sure that at least
ndo_select_queue is called before passing the frame to the netdev.

- Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists