netdev - Re: [PATCH] dp83640: Get gpio and master/slave configuration from DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:01:25 +0100
From:	Stefan Sørensen 
	<stefan.sorensen@...ctralink.com>
To:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC:	<grant.likely@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dp83640: Get gpio and master/slave configuration from DT

On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 19:46 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:00:40PM +0100, Stefan Sørensen wrote:
> > This patch removes the module parameters gpio_tab and chosen_phy in favour of
> > retrieving the configuration from DT through the properties
> 
> Can we please keep the module parameters? I have two platforms with
> phyters neither of which will ever support DT, namely ixp and m68k,
> and I want to run recent kernels on them.

I will keep the module parameters as fallback. Will it be OK to split
the gpio_tab parameter into separate calibrate-pin, perout-pins and
extts-pins parameters?

> > The configuration is now stored for each master clock device, allowing different 
> > gpio setups for each master.
> 
> What do you mean by "each master"? Do you mean each individual PHY device
> or each group of PHYs on the same MDIO bus?

I mean each group of PHYs. I will reword that.

Stefan


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html