lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:46:16 +0800
From:	Qin Chuanyu <qinchuanyu@...wei.com>
To:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
	KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx_ni

On 2014/2/12 13:28, Jason Wang wrote:

> A question: without NAPI weight, could this starve other net devices?
tap xmit skb use thread context,the poll func of physical nic driver
could be called in softirq context without change.

I had test it by binding vhost thread and physic nic interrupt on the 
same vcpu, use netperf xmit udp, test model is VM1-Host1-Host2.

if only VM1 xmit skb, the top show as below :
Cpu1 :0.0%us, 95.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id,  0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 5.0%si,  0.0%st

then use host2 xmit skb to VM1, the top show as below :
Cpu1 :0.0%us, 41.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id,  0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 59.0%si, 0.0%st

so I think there is no problem with this change.

>>   drivers/net/tun.c |    4 +++-
>>   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
>> index 44c4db8..90b4e58 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
>> @@ -1184,7 +1184,9 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct
>> *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
>>       skb_probe_transport_header(skb, 0);
>>
>>       rxhash = skb_get_hash(skb);
>> -    netif_rx_ni(skb);
>> +    rcu_read_lock_bh();
>> +    netif_receive_skb(skb);
>> +    rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>>
>>       tun->dev->stats.rx_packets++;
>>       tun->dev->stats.rx_bytes += len;
>
>
> .
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ