netdev - Re: [net-next v2 3/3] cfg80211: add MPLS and 802.21 classification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:57:25 +0100
From:	Simon Wunderlich <sw@...onwunderlich.de>
To:	Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	mathias.kretschmer@...us.fraunhofer.de
Subject: Re: [net-next v2 3/3] cfg80211: add MPLS and 802.21 classification

> On 02/17/14 17:56, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> > MPLS labels may contain traffic control information, which should be
> > evaluated and used by the wireless subsystem if present.
> > 
> > Also check for IEEE 802.21 which is always network control traffic.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Wunderlich<sw@...onwunderlich.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Mathias Kretschmer<mathias.kretschmer@...us.fraunhofer.de>
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes to first version:
> >   * include linux/mpls.h, not the UAPI one
> >   * change __constant_htons to htons
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> >   net/wireless/util.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c
> > index d39c371..54956eb 100644
> > --- a/net/wireless/util.c
> > +++ b/net/wireless/util.c
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > 
> >   #include<net/ip.h>
> >   #include<net/dsfield.h>
> >   #include<linux/if_vlan.h>
> > 
> > +#include<linux/mpls.h>
> > 
> >   #include "core.h"
> >   #include "rdev-ops.h"
> > 
> > @@ -710,6 +711,29 @@ unsigned int cfg80211_classify8021d(struct sk_buff
> > *skb,
> 
> So does the name still covers what it is doing now or should we just
> callit cfg80211_classify_skb()?

I'm not completely sure why this function is called 8021d anyway (isn't 802.1D 
the Spanning Tree definition?). The actual QoS definitions are appearently in 
802.1p. But I don't know both standards, so I'm just speculating. :) We can 
rename the function, but that would require more changes in drivers and 
mac80211.

Anyway, I can resend the patch along with a rename, but would prefer to get 
the first two proposed patches merged first if there are no further objections.

Cheers,
    Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html