netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: phy: add suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:34:38 +0100
From:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, f.fainelli@...il.com
CC:	andrew@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: add suspend_halted module param

On 02/25/2014 12:05 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:20:10 -0800
>
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> 2014-02-23 8:58 GMT-08:00 Sebastian Hesselbarth
>> <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>:
>>> commit 1211ce53077164e0d34641d0ca5fb4d4a7574498
>>>    ("net: phy: resume/suspend PHYs on attach/detach")
>>> introduced a feature to suspend PHYs when entering halted state.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, not all bootloaders properly power-up PHYs on reset
>>> and fail to access ethernet because the PHY is still powered down.
>>>
>>> Therefore, we add a boolean module parameter suspend_halted with
>>> default value of true. Disabling that parameter prevents PHYs from
>>> being suspended when entering halted state.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
>>> Reported-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>>> ---
>>> Andrew, can you please re-test if disabling the feature does work on
>>> your board? I tried a bunch of mine, but none failed to power-up the
>>> PHY in u-boot.
>>
>> Would be good to get Andrew's testing on this just to make sure it
>> solves his problem. Otherwise:
>>
>> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>
> I disagree with using a module parameter for this.
>
> Figure out the devices that cannot do this properly, and add
> an internal flag that this driver sets.

Hmm, as it seems to be a bootloader issue, it will be quite
impossible to determine if a board is affected or not.

I am still trying to get any of my boards to mis-behave the same
way to figure out what is really causing it.

We do still have 2-3 weeks to find a proper fix, don't we?

> Module parameters are terrible.

Maybe. If you prefer, I can remove the module param and leave
the sysfs entry?

Sebastian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html