lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:53:37 +0100 From: Karsten Keil <kkeil@...ux-pingi.de> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>, Michael Schmitz <schmitz@...phys.uni-duesseldorf.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] sleep_on removal, second try Am 26.02.2014 12:01, schrieb Arnd Bergmann: > It's been a while since the first submission of these patches, > but a lot of them have made it into linux-next already, so here > is the stuff that is not merged yet, hopefully addressing all > the comments. > > Geert and Michael: the I was expecting the ataflop and atari_scsi > patches to be merged already, based on earlier discussion. > Can you apply them to the linux-m68k tree, or do you prefer > them to go through the scsi and block maintainers? > > Jens: I did not get any comments for the DAC960 and swim3 patches, > I assume they are good to go in. Please merge. > > Hans and Mauro: As I commented on the old thread, I thought the > four media patches were on their way. I have addressed the one > comment that I missed earlier now, and used Hans' version for > the two patches he changed. Please merge or let me know the status > if you have already put them in some tree, but not yet into linux-next > > Greg or Andrew: The parport subsystem is orphaned unfortunately, > can one of you pick up that patch? > > Davem: The two ATM patches got acks, but I did not hear back from > Karsten regarding the ISDN patches. Can you pick up all six, or > should we wait for comments about the ISDN patches? > Ack on the ISDN stuff (12,13,14,15) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists