netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: send arp requests even if there's no route to them

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Feb 2014 03:38:19 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	François CACHEREUL <f.cachereul@...halink.fr>,
	Zhenjie Chen <zhchen@...hat.com>,
	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: send arp requests even if there's no
 route to them

On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 12:28 +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 03:12:51AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> >On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 11:57 +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> ...snip...
> >> +			if (bond->params.arp_validate)
> >> +				pr_warn("%s: no route to arp_ip_target %pI4 and arp_validate is set\n",
> >> +					bond->dev->name, &targets[i]);
> >
> >Maybe
> >
> >			if (bond->params.arp_validate && net_ratelimit())
> 
> Hm, not that I'm against it - but bond_arp_send_all() is called every
> arp_interval - which is usually >50ms. Does it really make sense to put it
> here?

Dunno, but you're converting a generally not emitted pr_debug
(DEBUG isn't set, so it'd have to be enabled by dynamic_debug)
to something that'll always print out a line for each of up to
16 targets, so it seems it could be pretty noisy.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html