netdev - Re: [RFC v3 0/6] networking: address root block upon initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:44:16 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/6] networking: address root block upon initialization

On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:05:18 -0800
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> <mcgrof@...not-panic.com> wrote:
> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
> 
> <-- snip -->
> 
> > As I tested using the root block preference I noticed that if a net_device
> > slave under the bridge gets the designated root port prior to setting in
> > userspace the root_block feature enabling the feature won't kick the
> > bridge to remove that net_device from the designated port. I addressed
> > that issue and also upkeeping the initial random MAC address given to
> > the bridge as if othwerwise we'd end up with a zero MAC address bridge
> > if we root block all ports. I have only done local tests I'd appreciate a
> > bit more wide test coverage and review.
> 
> 
> Stephen,
> 
> I should note that even if we discard patches 4-6 patches for an
> alternative implementation patches 1-3 should still be applicable for
> review. Let me know what you think of those.
> 
>   Luis
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

I agree with 0-3 as normal improvements.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html