netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/9] netpoll: Cleanup received packet processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Mar 2014 22:59:23 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc:	stephen@...workplumber.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, mpm@...enic.com,
	satyam.sharma@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] netpoll: Cleanup received packet processing

From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:30:14 -0700

> This is the long-winded, careful, and polite version of removing the netpoll
> receive packet processing.
> 
> First I untangle the code in small steps.  Then I modify the code to not
> force reception and dropping of packets when we are transmiting a packet
> with netpoll.  Finally I move all of the packet reception under
> CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP and delete CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP.
> 
> If someone wants to do a stable backport it would take backporting
> the first 18 patches that handle the budget == 0 in the networking
> drivers, and the first 5 of these patches.
> 
> If anyone wants to resurrect netpoll packet reception someday it should
> just be a matter of reverting the last patch.

This looks great, but it doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, please
respin.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html