netdev - [PATCH net-next 01/10] tipc: always use tipc_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 May 2014 08:56:09 +0800
From:	Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
To:	<davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<jon.maloy@...csson.com>, <Paul.Gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	<erik.hugne@...csson.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 01/10] tipc: always use tipc_node_lock() to hold node lock

Although we obtain node lock with tipc_node_lock() in most time, there
are still places where we directly use native spin lock interface
to grab node lock. But as we will do more jobs in the future when node
lock is released, we should ensure that tipc_node_lock() is always
called when node lock is taken.

Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@...csson.com>
Reviewed-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
---
 net/tipc/link.c       |   12 ++++++------
 net/tipc/name_distr.c |    6 +++---
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
index c723ee9..3a80145 100644
--- a/net/tipc/link.c
+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
@@ -297,14 +297,14 @@ void tipc_link_delete_list(unsigned int bearer_id, bool shutting_down)
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(n_ptr, &tipc_node_list, list) {
-		spin_lock_bh(&n_ptr->lock);
+		tipc_node_lock(n_ptr);
 		l_ptr = n_ptr->links[bearer_id];
 		if (l_ptr) {
 			tipc_link_reset(l_ptr);
 			if (shutting_down || !tipc_node_is_up(n_ptr)) {
 				tipc_node_detach_link(l_ptr->owner, l_ptr);
 				tipc_link_reset_fragments(l_ptr);
-				spin_unlock_bh(&n_ptr->lock);
+				tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
 
 				/* Nobody else can access this link now: */
 				del_timer_sync(&l_ptr->timer);
@@ -312,12 +312,12 @@ void tipc_link_delete_list(unsigned int bearer_id, bool shutting_down)
 			} else {
 				/* Detach/delete when failover is finished: */
 				l_ptr->flags |= LINK_STOPPED;
-				spin_unlock_bh(&n_ptr->lock);
+				tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
 				del_timer_sync(&l_ptr->timer);
 			}
 			continue;
 		}
-		spin_unlock_bh(&n_ptr->lock);
+		tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
@@ -474,11 +474,11 @@ void tipc_link_reset_list(unsigned int bearer_id)
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(n_ptr, &tipc_node_list, list) {
-		spin_lock_bh(&n_ptr->lock);
+		tipc_node_lock(n_ptr);
 		l_ptr = n_ptr->links[bearer_id];
 		if (l_ptr)
 			tipc_link_reset(l_ptr);
-		spin_unlock_bh(&n_ptr->lock);
+		tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
diff --git a/net/tipc/name_distr.c b/net/tipc/name_distr.c
index 974a73f..8465263 100644
--- a/net/tipc/name_distr.c
+++ b/net/tipc/name_distr.c
@@ -135,18 +135,18 @@ void named_cluster_distribute(struct sk_buff *buf)
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(n_ptr, &tipc_node_list, list) {
-		spin_lock_bh(&n_ptr->lock);
+		tipc_node_lock(n_ptr);
 		l_ptr = n_ptr->active_links[n_ptr->addr & 1];
 		if (l_ptr) {
 			buf_copy = skb_copy(buf, GFP_ATOMIC);
 			if (!buf_copy) {
-				spin_unlock_bh(&n_ptr->lock);
+				tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
 				break;
 			}
 			msg_set_destnode(buf_msg(buf_copy), n_ptr->addr);
 			__tipc_link_xmit(l_ptr, buf_copy);
 		}
-		spin_unlock_bh(&n_ptr->lock);
+		tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html