| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 11:40:38 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Xi Wang <xii@...gle.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: Maxim Krasnyansky <maxk@....qualcomm.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net-tun: restructure tun_do_read for better sleep/wakeup
efficiency
On 05/07/2014 08:24 AM, Xi Wang wrote:
> tun_do_read always adds current thread to wait queue, even if a packet
> is ready to read. This is inefficient because both sleeper and waker
> want to acquire the wait queue spin lock when packet rate is high.
After commit 61a5ff15ebdab87887861a6b128b108404e4706d, this will only
help for blocking read. Looks like for performance critical userspaces,
they will use non blocking reads.
>
> We restructure the read function and use common kernel networking
> routines to handle receive, sleep and wakeup. With the change
> available packets are checked first before the reading thread is added
> to the wait queue.
This is interesting, since it may help if we want to add rx busy loop
for tun. (In fact I worked a similar patch like this).
>
> Ran performance tests with the following configuration:
>
> - my packet generator -> tap1 -> br0 -> tap0 -> my packet consumer
> - sender pinned to one core and receiver pinned to another core
> - sender send small UDP packets (64 bytes total) as fast as it can
> - sandy bridge cores
> - throughput are receiver side goodput numbers
>
> The results are
>
> baseline: 757k pkts/sec, cpu utilization at 1.54 cpus
> changed: 804k pkts/sec, cpu utilization at 1.57 cpus
>
> The performance difference is largely determined by packet rate and
> inter-cpu communication cost. For example, if the sender and
> receiver are pinned to different cpu sockets, the results are
>
> baseline: 558k pkts/sec, cpu utilization at 1.71 cpus
> changed: 690k pkts/sec, cpu utilization at 1.67 cpus
So I believe your consumer is using blocking reads. How about re-test
with non blocking reads and re-test to make sure no regression?
>
> Co-authored-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xii@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/tun.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index ee328ba..cb25385 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -133,8 +133,7 @@ struct tap_filter {
> struct tun_file {
> struct sock sk;
> struct socket socket;
> - struct socket_wq wq;
> - struct tun_struct __rcu *tun;
> + struct tun_struct __rcu *tun ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
This seems a optimization which is un-related to the topic. May send as
another patch but did you really see improvement for this?
> struct net *net;
> struct fasync_struct *fasync;
> /* only used for fasnyc */
> @@ -498,12 +497,12 @@ static void tun_detach_all(struct net_device *dev)
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> tfile = rtnl_dereference(tun->tfiles[i]);
> BUG_ON(!tfile);
> - wake_up_all(&tfile->wq.wait);
> + tfile->socket.sk->sk_data_ready(tfile->socket.sk);
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(tfile->tun, NULL);
> --tun->numqueues;
> }
> list_for_each_entry(tfile, &tun->disabled, next) {
> - wake_up_all(&tfile->wq.wait);
> + tfile->socket.sk->sk_data_ready(tfile->socket.sk);
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(tfile->tun, NULL);
> }
> BUG_ON(tun->numqueues != 0);
> @@ -807,8 +806,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> /* Notify and wake up reader process */
> if (tfile->flags & TUN_FASYNC)
> kill_fasync(&tfile->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
> - wake_up_interruptible_poll(&tfile->wq.wait, POLLIN |
> - POLLRDNORM | POLLRDBAND);
> + tfile->socket.sk->sk_data_ready(tfile->socket.sk);
>
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> @@ -965,7 +963,7 @@ static unsigned int tun_chr_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
>
> tun_debug(KERN_INFO, tun, "tun_chr_poll\n");
>
> - poll_wait(file, &tfile->wq.wait, wait);
> + poll_wait(file, sk_sleep(sk), wait);
>
> if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue))
> mask |= POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
> @@ -1330,46 +1328,21 @@ done:
> static ssize_t tun_do_read(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
> const struct iovec *iv, ssize_t len, int noblock)
> {
> - DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> ssize_t ret = 0;
> + int peeked, err, off = 0;
>
> tun_debug(KERN_INFO, tun, "tun_do_read\n");
>
> - if (unlikely(!noblock))
> - add_wait_queue(&tfile->wq.wait, &wait);
> - while (len) {
> - if (unlikely(!noblock))
> - current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
> -
> - /* Read frames from the queue */
> - if (!(skb = skb_dequeue(&tfile->socket.sk->sk_receive_queue))) {
> - if (noblock) {
> - ret = -EAGAIN;
> - break;
> - }
> - if (signal_pending(current)) {
> - ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
> - break;
> - }
> - if (tun->dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) {
> - ret = -EIO;
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - /* Nothing to read, let's sleep */
> - schedule();
> - continue;
> - }
> + if (!len)
> + return ret;
>
> + /* Read frames from queue */
> + skb = __skb_recv_datagram(tfile->socket.sk, noblock ? MSG_DONTWAIT : 0,
> + &peeked, &off, &err);
> + if (skb) {
This changes the userspace ABI a little bit. Originally, userspace can
see different error codes and do responds, but here it can only see zero.
> ret = tun_put_user(tun, tfile, skb, iv, len);
> kfree_skb(skb);
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - if (unlikely(!noblock)) {
> - current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
> - remove_wait_queue(&tfile->wq.wait, &wait);
> }
>
> return ret;
> @@ -2187,20 +2160,28 @@ out:
> static int tun_chr_open(struct inode *inode, struct file * file)
> {
> struct tun_file *tfile;
> + struct socket_wq *wq;
>
> DBG1(KERN_INFO, "tunX: tun_chr_open\n");
>
> + wq = kzalloc(sizeof(*wq), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!wq)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
Why not just reusing the socket_wq structure inside tun_file structure
like what we did in the past?
> tfile = (struct tun_file *)sk_alloc(&init_net, AF_UNSPEC, GFP_KERNEL,
> &tun_proto);
> - if (!tfile)
> + if (!tfile) {
> + kfree(wq);
> return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(tfile->tun, NULL);
> tfile->net = get_net(current->nsproxy->net_ns);
> tfile->flags = 0;
> tfile->ifindex = 0;
>
> - rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->socket.wq, &tfile->wq);
> - init_waitqueue_head(&tfile->wq.wait);
> + init_waitqueue_head(&wq->wait);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(tfile->socket.wq, wq);
>
> tfile->socket.file = file;
> tfile->socket.ops = &tun_socket_ops;
> @@ -2224,9 +2205,12 @@ static int tun_chr_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> struct tun_file *tfile = file->private_data;
> struct net *net = tfile->net;
> + struct socket_wq *wq;
>
> + wq = rcu_dereference_protected(tfile->socket.wq, 1);
> tun_detach(tfile, true);
> put_net(net);
> + kfree_rcu(wq, rcu);
>
> return 0;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists