lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 21:47:16 -0700 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, David Ertman <davidx.m.ertman@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Fix checkpatch false positive due to ternary operator break On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 21:41 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > From: David Ertman <davidx.m.ertman@...el.com> Hey David. > Using the intuitive breaking of a ternary operator used in the > initialization of a variable in its declaration: > > type var = FOO ? > BAR : > FEE; [] > type var = FOO > ? BAR > : FEE; > > Change checkpatch so that it is checking fot the correct breaking of ternary > operators used in networking variable declaration/initialization. There is no "correct" breaking for ternary operators. Both should be acceptable. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists