netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2] fq: don't allow set options to zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 May 2014 14:55:06 +0800
From:	Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	<stephen@...workplumber.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] fq: don't allow set options to zero

On 2014/5/12 14:51, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> On 2014/5/12 13:58, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 12:18 +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>>> Now options of fair queue can be zero but cannot be (~0U).
>>> Zero is useless, so don't allow set the options to zero.
>>> Also, maxrate cannot be reset to unlimited because it
>>> cannot be (~0U).
>>>
>>> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>>  tc/q_fq.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> No, you are changing behavior for existing scripts.
>>
>> If you really want to fix these cases, you need to do it properly.
>>
> 
> Do you mean allow options set to zero changing the behavior ?
> 
> Regards,
> Yang
> 
My bad, please ignore this mail.

Sorry for the noisy.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html