| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:06:54 -0500 From: Carol Soto <clsoto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] mlx4: mlx4_core failed to load On 4/28/2014 2:59 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: clsoto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com > Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:33:30 -0500 > >> This is for a case where mlx4_core fails to load. > You cannot just will-nilly delete module parameters that you decide > you don't want to support any more. > > Once you add a module parameter, you are stuck with it forever once > it makes it into a released kernel. It is a user visible interface. > > I'm not applying this patch, you have to actually fix the bug rather > then wholesale remove the facility altogether. The problem here is that when use_prio argument is used then the number of reserved qps increase from 0x20000 to 0x90000. So when it goes to mlx4_bitmap_init the argument reserved_top becomes a lot bigger than argument num, because of this then the math to get the size for the kzalloc is very big. The argument num is the num of qps that the adapter supports so then this sounds to me like a bug that if we use the use_prio we can not have more qps reserved than the num qps that adapter supports. That is why I went to the path of removing the argument in this patch. Any other suggestion? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists