netdev - Re: bonding directly changes underlying device address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 May 2014 15:37:17 +0300
From:	Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
To:	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
Cc:	Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Eyal Perry <eyalpe@...lanox.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Noa Osherovich <noaos@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: bonding directly changes underlying device address

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 06:38:45PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> ...snip...
>
>>         So, I'd say "No" to conversion to dev_set_mac_address() and
>> "show me the code" to the "stash it in the slave" plan.
>
>
> Ok, got it, I will try to move it to struct slave.

Good, and following that we'll see if/what remains on our mlx4_en/any
driver plate to fix under the TLB use case (hopefully none..)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html