lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 16 May 2014 15:17:01 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	cwang@...pensource.com
Subject: Re: [Patch net] loopback: explicitly set pkt_type to PACKET_HOST

From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 10:52:09 -0700

> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:34 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 11:39:22 -0700
>>
>>> From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
>>>
>>> In a corner case where I redirect the packets from veth to lo,
>>> packets are dropped silently when entering IP stack. This is
>>> due to we have a different MAC addr on veth, so the packets are
>>> marked as PACKET_OTHERHOST. And after they are redirect to lo,
>>> this value is kept since lo has the same MAC addr with the packets.
>>> Loopback should explicitly set it to PACKET_HOST before calling
>>> eth_type_trans() for this specific case.
>>>
>>> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>>> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
>>
>> How exactly are you performing this redirection?
> 
> Oh, I meant using tc mirred action to redirect packets from vethX to lo.
> Sorry for confusing.

I think you can't expect arbitrary redirection of packets from an outgoing
interface back into the stack via loopback to work like that.

The is never any legitimate reason in this type of flow to override the
decisions made by eth_type_trans() as to the disposition of the packet type.

I'm not applying this, sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ