netdev - RE: [Xen-devel] xen-netfront possibly rides the rocket too often

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 May 2014 10:05:46 +0000
From:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	'Wei Liu' <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
	Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>
CC:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] xen-netfront possibly rides the rocket too often

From: Wei Liu
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:14:00PM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
> [...]
> > > Wei.
> > >
> > Reading more of the code I would agree. The definition of MAX_SKB_FRAGS (at
> > least now with compound pages) cannot be used in any way to derive the number of
> > 4k slots a transfer will require.
> >
> > Zoltan already commented on worst cases. Not sure it would get as bad as that or
> > "just" 16*4k frags all in the middle of compound pages. That would then end in
> > around 33 or 34 slots, depending on the header.
> >
> > Zoltan wrote:
> > > I think the worst case scenario is when every frag and the linear buffer contains 2 bytes,
> > > which are overlapping a page boundary (that's (17+1)*2=36 so far), plus 15 of
> > them have a 4k
> > > page in the middle of them, so, a 1+4096+1 byte buffer can span over 3 page.
> > > That's 51 individual pages.
> >
> > I cannot claim to really know what to expect worst case. Somewhat I was thinking
> > of a worst case of (16+1)*2, which would be inconvenient enough.
> >
> > So without knowing exactly how to do it, but as Ian said it sounds best to come
> > up with some sort of exception coalescing in cases the slot count goes over 18
> > and we know the data size is below 64K.
> >
> 
> I took a stab at it this morning and came up with this patch. Ran
> redis-benchmark, it seemed to fix that for me -- only saw one "failed to
> linearize skb" during
> 
>   redis-benchmark -h XXX -d 1000 -t lrange
> 
> And before this change, a lot of "rides rocket" were triggered.
> 
> Thought?
> 
> ---8<---
> From 743495a2b2d338fc6cfe9bfd4b6e840392b87f4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 10:39:01 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] xen-netfront: linearize SKB if it occupies too many slots
> 
> Some workload, such as Redis can generate SKBs which make use of compound
> pages. Netfront doesn't quite like that because it doesn't want to send
> exessive slots to the backend as backend might deem it malicious. On the
> flip side these packets are actually legit, the size check at the
> beginning of xennet_start_xmit ensures that packet size is below 64K.
> 
> So we linearize SKB if it occupies too many slots. If the linearization
> fails then the SKB is dropped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/xen-netfront.c |   18 +++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> index 895355d..0361fc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> @@ -573,9 +573,21 @@ static int xennet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>  	slots = DIV_ROUND_UP(offset + len, PAGE_SIZE) +
>  		xennet_count_skb_frag_slots(skb);
>  	if (unlikely(slots > MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1)) {
> -		net_alert_ratelimited(
> -			"xennet: skb rides the rocket: %d slots\n", slots);
> -		goto drop;
> +		if (skb_linearize(skb)) {

You don't need to actually linearize the skb here.
One with multiple fragments is fine.
I'm not sure there is a standard function to 'copy and refragment'
the skb data though.

> +			net_alert_ratelimited(
> +				"xennet: failed to linearize skb, skb dropped\n");
> +			goto drop;
> +		}
> +		data = skb->data;
> +		offset = offset_in_page(data);
> +		len = skb_headlen(skb);
> +		slots = DIV_ROUND_UP(offset + len, PAGE_SIZE) +
> +			xennet_count_skb_frag_slots(skb);

IIRC If you have called skb_linearize then there shouldn't be any fragments.

> +		if (unlikely(slots > MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1)) {
> +			net_alert_ratelimited(
> +				"xennet: still too many slots after linerization: %d", slots);
> +			goto drop;
> +		}
>  	}
> 
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&np->tx_lock, flags);
> --
> 1.7.10.4

	David



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html