lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 20 May 2014 09:05:38 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Igor Royzis <igorr@...rtex.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Anton Nayshtut <anton@...rtex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed zero copy GSO without orphaning the fragments

On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 07:28 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 14:24 +0300, Igor Royzis wrote:
> > Fix accessing GSO fragments memory (and a possible corruption therefore) after
> > reporting completion in a zero copy callback. The previous fix in the commit 1fd819ec
> > orphaned frags which eliminates zero copy advantages. The fix makes the completion
> > called after all the fragments were processed avoiding unnecessary orphaning/copying
> > from userspace.
> > 
> > The GSO fragments corruption issue was observed in a typical QEMU/KVM VM setup that
> > hosts a Windows guest (since QEMU virtio-net Windows driver doesn't support GRO).
> > The fix has been verified by running the HCK OffloadLSO test.
> > 

It looks like all segments (generated by GSO segmentation) should share
original ubuf_info, and that it should be refcounted.

A nightmare I suppose...

(transferring the ubuf_info from original skb to last segment would be
racy, as the last segment could be freed _before_ previous ones, in case
a drop happens in qdisc layer, or packets are reordered by netem)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ