netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v2 1/1] bring netlink interface to par with brctl show macs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 May 2014 22:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jhs@...atatu.com
Cc:	ben@...adent.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	stephen@...workplumber.org, vyasevic@...hat.com,
	john.r.fastabend@...el.com, sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 1/1] bring netlink interface to par with
 brctl show macs

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 07:05:01 -0400

> On 05/25/14 22:35, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 09:15 -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> 
>>> +		if (dev == NULL) {
>>> + pr_info("PF_BRIDGE: RTM_GETNEIGH with unknown ifindex\n");
>>
>> You left another debug message here.
>>
>>> +			return -ENODEV;
>>>   		}
> 
>>> +			pr_info("PF_BRIDGE: RTM_GETNEIGH %s no dumper\n",
>>> +				dev->name);
>>
>> And here.
> 
> Those two just adhere to the coding style used in the rest of the fdb
> code. I could remove them and send subsequent patches to remove
> equivalent debugs in the rest of the code. To me they seem useful
> although i have seen very strong views against them in the past.

I think we have to get rid of these, because they are essentially
user triggerable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html