netdev - Re: Bug 75571

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:22:12 +0700
From:	Alex <d77190@...l.ru>
To:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug 75571

В Ср, 04/06/2014 в 17:27 -0700, Cong Wang пишет:

> Thanks for testing!
> 
> Thinking a bit more, the question is why
> skb_push(skb->dev->hard_header_len) is not correct here? It looks
> like we don't calculate tunnel->dev->hard_header_len correctly. But
> ipip_tunnel_bind_dev() should do the right thing less your setup is not
> correct, in that case your ipip tunnel should not receive any packet.
> We should be safe.
> 
> Which is the interface routing to 192.168.18.17 on your system? Which
> driver does it use?

Its a stock e1000e from kernel with no special options. No jumbo frames,
etc.

lspci says:
Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82572EI Gigabit Ethernet
Controller (Copper) (rev 06)

IPIP tunnel runs on top of this interface.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html