lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 6 Jun 2014 16:24:39 +0000
From:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: SCTP seems to lose its socket state.

From: David Laight
> From: David Laight
> > I've been looking at an ethernet trace from one of our customers.
> > They seem to have got an SCTP socket into a rather confused state.
> >
> > There seem to be a significant number of transmit ethernet frames
> > that don't read the far end.
> > This shouldn't cause a real problem, but we end up with the following:
> > This trace was taken on the linux system:
> >
> > 39964   0.304473        ->      SCTP    INIT
> > 39965   0.292669        <-      SCTP    INIT  (I think this has an invalid checksum)
> > 39968   0.467935        <-      SCTP    INIT
> > 39969   0.000093        ->      SCTP    INIT_ACK
> > 39970   0.003947        <-      SCTP    COOKIE_ECHO
> > 39971   0.000072        ->      SCTP    COOKIE_ACK
> > 39972   0.000337        ->      M3UA    ASPUP
> > 39979   0.809659        <-      SCTP    COOKIE_ECHO
> > 39980   0.000058        ->      SCTP    COOKIE_ACK
> > shutdown() called here - seems to be ignored
> > 39983   0.949471        <-      SCTP    COOKIE_ECHO
> > 39984   0.000053        ->      SCTP    COOKIE_ACK
> > 39986   0.730072        ->      M3UA    ASPUP           Same TSN as above
> > 40002   0.270589        ->      M3UA    ASPUP           Same TSN as above
> > 40008   3.689088        <-      SCTP    HEARTBEAT
> > 40009   0.000027        ->      SCTP    HEARTBEAT_ACK
> > 40014   0.261152        <-      SCTP    HEARTBEAT
> > 40015   0.000033        ->      SCTP    HEARTBEAT_ACK
> > 40026   0.123048        <-      SCTP    HEARTBEAT
> > 40027   0.000030        ->      SCTP    HEARTBEAT_ACK
> > 40036   1.615048        ->      M3UA    ASPUP           Same TSN as above
> >
> > There are no signs of any SACKs for the ASPUP, I think they have the
> > correct TSN (the same value as in the INIT_ACK).
> > No signs of any shutdowns or aborts from either system.
> >
> > As seems to be typical for M3UA the source and destination ports are
> > the same. No additional IP addresses appear in the INIT (etc) messages.
> 
> I think I've reproduced this on a 3.14.0 kernel.
> 
> System A: Bind to port 1234, connect to B:1234.
>           If the connect fails, retry 10 seconds later.
>           When the connection completes send some data.
>           Disconnect if the reflected data isn't received within 2 seconds.
> System B: Bind to port 1234, connect to A:1234.
>           If the connect fails, retry 10 seconds later.
>           Reflect any received data.
> 
> Initially the INIT chunks generate ABORTs (no listener) so both
> programs just retry every 10 seconds.
> 
> On B run:
>     iptables -A INPUT -p sctp --chunk-types any INIT -j DROP
>     iptables -A INPUT -p sctp --chunk-types any DATA -j DROP
> The first allows the connection to complete.
> The second stops B acking the data.
> The data is resent on timeout, and the systems exchange HBs.
> 
> I'd expect that a SHUTDOWN or ABORT be sent reasonably quickly.
> But the systems just exchange HBs for over 5 minutes.
> (I'm seeing an ABORT because B gives up waiting for the message.)

Seems I wasn't waiting long enough.
A does eventually send an ABORT after about 7 minutes.

In the customer's trace the remote (B) system has silently given up
and then resends an INIT well before the 7 minutes have elapsed.
I'm not sure how to go about reproducing that (without major
kernel hacking).

Maybe I can suppress the ABORT from B.

	David



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ