netdev - Re: Is: automated testing before David M picks them up? Was: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2] xen-netback: bookkeep number of active queues in our own module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
	ian.campbell@...rix.com, xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
	wei.liu2@...rix.com
Subject: Re: Is: automated testing before David M picks them up? Was: Re:
 [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2] xen-netback: bookkeep number of active queues
 in our own module

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:31:51 -0400

> Having said that - how do you handle such situation with sub-maintainers
> wanting to do some testing before they are cleared to go your way?

Who cares, the bug gets found eventually right?

There is no value in my letting changes sit for more than a day or two that
aren't being actively discussed and look fine to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html