| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 15:39:33 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
richardcochran@...ail.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] net-timestamp: explicit SO_TIMESTAMPING ancillary data struct
Applications that request kernel transmit timestamps with
SO_TIMESTAMPING read timestamps using recvmsg() ancillary data.
This patch explicitly defines the struct that applications read, and
the semantics of its fields.
The code is backward compatible with legacy applications that treat
the ancillary data as an anonymous array 'struct timespec data[3]'.
Beyond documenting existing use, it adds support for new timestamping
points in the kernel tx datapath. On tx, the scm_timestamping struct
is always accompanied with an error message of type sock_exterr_skb.
This patch defines the previously unused field ee_info in that struct
as an explicit type field, communicating the type of each timestamp
in the three struct timespec in scm_timestamping. This does not change
legacy expectations, but allows returning multiple timestamp types to
the calling process.
This patch does not modify the reception path. On rx, SO_TIMESTAMPING
csmgs are not accompanied by a struct similar to sock_exterr_skb. If
at some point rx timestamp points are added, a similar extension in a
new cmsg can be defined.
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
---
include/linux/skbuff.h | 2 ++
include/uapi/linux/errqueue.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
net/core/skbuff.c | 1 +
net/socket.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index ec89301..c74aab5 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -260,6 +260,8 @@ enum {
SKBTX_SHARED_FRAG = 1 << 5,
};
+#define SKBTX_ANY_TSTAMP (SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP | SKBTX_SW_TSTAMP)
+
/*
* The callback notifies userspace to release buffers when skb DMA is done in
* lower device, the skb last reference should be 0 when calling this.
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/errqueue.h b/include/uapi/linux/errqueue.h
index aacd4fb..5d93d0b 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/errqueue.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/errqueue.h
@@ -22,5 +22,24 @@ struct sock_extended_err {
#define SO_EE_OFFENDER(ee) ((struct sockaddr*)((ee)+1))
+/**
+ * struct scm_timestamping - timestamps exposed through cmsg
+ *
+ * The timestamping interfaces SO_TIMESTAMPING, MSG_TSTAMP_*
+ * communicate network timestamps by passing this struct in a cmsg with
+ * recvmsg(). See Documentation/networking/timestamping.txt for details.
+ */
+struct scm_timestamping {
+ struct timespec ts[3];
+};
+
+#define SCM_TSTAMP_SND 0x1 /* driver passed skb to NIC */
+#define SCM_TSTAMP_ACK 0x2 /* transport layer saw ACK */
+#define SCM_TSTAMP_ENQ 0x4 /* stack passed skb to TC layer */
+#define SCM_TSTAMP_RCV 0x8 /* stack received skb */
+#define SCM_TSTAMP_HWSYS 0x10 /* NIC tstamp in system format */
+#define SCM_TSTAMP_HWRAW 0x20 /* NIC tstamp in native format */
+
+#define SCM_TSTAMP_OFF(n, ts) (ts << (10 * n))
#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_ERRQUEUE_H */
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index c1a3303..1bcd05d 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -3521,6 +3521,7 @@ void skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
memset(serr, 0, sizeof(*serr));
serr->ee.ee_errno = ENOMSG;
serr->ee.ee_origin = SO_EE_ORIGIN_TIMESTAMPING;
+ serr->ee.ee_info = hwtstamps ? 0 : SCM_TSTAMP_SND;
err = sock_queue_err_skb(sk, skb);
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index abf56b2..a31138d 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@
#include <linux/sockios.h>
#include <linux/atalk.h>
#include <net/busy_poll.h>
+#include <linux/errqueue.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
unsigned int sysctl_net_busy_read __read_mostly;
@@ -696,9 +697,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_sendmsg);
void __sock_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *skb)
{
+ struct sock_exterr_skb *serr = SKB_EXT_ERR(skb);
int need_software_tstamp = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RCVTSTAMP);
- struct timespec ts[3];
- int empty = 1;
+ struct scm_timestamping tss;
+ int tstype = 0, is_tx = skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_ANY_TSTAMP;
struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *shhwtstamps =
skb_hwtstamps(skb);
@@ -714,28 +716,31 @@ void __sock_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SCM_TIMESTAMP,
sizeof(tv), &tv);
} else {
- skb_get_timestampns(skb, &ts[0]);
+ struct timespec ts;
+ skb_get_timestampns(skb, &ts);
put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SCM_TIMESTAMPNS,
- sizeof(ts[0]), &ts[0]);
+ sizeof(ts), &ts);
}
}
-
- memset(ts, 0, sizeof(ts));
+ memset(&tss, 0, sizeof(tss));
if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE) &&
- ktime_to_timespec_cond(skb->tstamp, ts + 0))
- empty = 0;
+ ktime_to_timespec_cond(skb->tstamp, tss.ts + 0))
+ tstype |= is_tx ? serr->ee.ee_info : SCM_TSTAMP_RCV;
if (shhwtstamps) {
if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_SYS_HARDWARE) &&
- ktime_to_timespec_cond(shhwtstamps->syststamp, ts + 1))
- empty = 0;
+ ktime_to_timespec_cond(shhwtstamps->syststamp, tss.ts + 1))
+ tstype |= SCM_TSTAMP_OFF(1, SCM_TSTAMP_HWSYS);
if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE) &&
- ktime_to_timespec_cond(shhwtstamps->hwtstamp, ts + 2))
- empty = 0;
+ ktime_to_timespec_cond(shhwtstamps->hwtstamp, tss.ts + 2))
+ tstype |= SCM_TSTAMP_OFF(2, SCM_TSTAMP_HWRAW);
}
- if (!empty)
+ if (tstype) {
+ if (is_tx)
+ serr->ee.ee_info = tstype;
put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET,
- SCM_TIMESTAMPING, sizeof(ts), &ts);
+ SCM_TIMESTAMPING, sizeof(tss), &tss);
+ }
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__sock_recv_timestamp);
--
2.0.0.526.g5318336
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists