netdev - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for stable 3.10] xen-netback: drop SKB from internal queue if frontend is disconnected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:57:03 +0100
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	Philipp Hahn <hahn@...vention.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for stable 3.10] xen-netback: drop SKB from
 internal queue if frontend is disconnected

On 11/07/14 14:08, Wei Liu wrote:
> 
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> @@ -720,6 +720,16 @@ static void xen_netbk_rx_action(struct xen_netbk *netbk)
>  		vif = netdev_priv(skb->dev);
>  		nr_frags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
>  
> +		/* In rare case that frontend is disconnected while
> +		 * there's still SKBs stuck in netback internal
> +		 * rx_queue, drop these SKBs.
> +		 */
> +		if (unlikely(!vif->ring_mapped)) {
> +			dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> +			xenvif_put(vif);
> +			continue;
> +		}

Is this racy?  The ring may be unmapped after the test but before we put
responses on it.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html