netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] vxlan: Be liberal on receive and only require the I bit to be set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2014 22:28:11 +0100
From:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, therbert@...gle.com,
	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, pshelar@...ira.com,
	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
	dborkman@...hat.com,
	"Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth)" <pritkoth@...co.com>,
	Madhu Challa <challa@...ronetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] vxlan: Be liberal on receive and only
 require the I bit to be set

On 07/11/14 at 12:41pm, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:59:49 +0200
> Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
> 
> > @@ -1617,7 +1646,9 @@ static int vxlan6_xmit_skb(struct vxlan_sock *vs,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	vxh = (struct vxlanhdr *) __skb_push(skb, sizeof(*vxh));
> > -	vxh->vx_flags = htonl(VXLAN_FLAGS);
> > +	vxlan_flags(vxh) = VXLAN_FLAG_VNI;
> > +	vxh->vx_reserved1 = 0;
> > +	vxh->vx_reserved2 = 0;
> >  	vxh->vx_vni = vni;
> >  
>  
> Okay, but initializing bitfields generates crappy code.
> Can we just alias and do one assignment.

Sure, I'll resend.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html