netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] bonding: make hard-coded defines configurable at build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	vfalico@...il.com
Cc:	alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	j.vosburgh@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] bonding: make hard-coded defines
 configurable at build

From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 21:18:11 +0200

> No spec, but a reply from a juniper employee, as it states:
> 
> http://forums.juniper.net/t5/Ethernet-Switching/Is-it-possible-to-do-QinQinQ/td-p/29409

I will note that this engineer uses the word "should".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html