netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] nftables: Convert nft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 01 Aug 2014 16:00:00 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
CC:	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
	challa@...ronetworks.com, walpole@...pdx.edu, dev@...nvswitch.org,
	tklauser@...tanz.ch, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] nftables: Convert nft_hash to use generic rhashtable

On 1. August 2014 15:51:45 GMT+01:00, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
>On 08/01/14 at 03:12pm, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> On 1. August 2014 14:49:01 GMT+01:00, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
>wrote:
>> >On 08/01/14 at 02:21pm, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> >> Sorry for the late response but I just got around to check the 3rd
>> >patch now,
>> >> so my question about this fragment is: before nft_hash_remove()
>would
>> >free the
>> >> element after removal, but after this change I don't see where and
>> >when the
>> >> removed element would get freed ?
>> >
>> >You are right. Looking at this closer we were leaking references
>even
>> >before the change because it would not call nft_data_uninit() to
>> >release
>> >the data objects. So it should really just call
>> >nft_hash_elem_destroy().
>> 
>> No, the data uninit is performed by the set core. Just freeing it is
>fine.
>
>OK, I can see the uninit on the data in nft_del_setelem() for maps
>prior to the actual commit. The location is slightly unexpected since
>the element is still findable in the hash table at that point.

That's most likely a bug from the transaction API.

Pablo?

>I'll wait a short while to see if there is more feedback and resubmit
>afterwards.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html