netdev - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2 2/3] xen-netback: don't stop dealloc kthread too early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:13:41 +0100
From:	Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
To:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2 2/3] xen-netback: don't stop dealloc
 kthread too early

On 11/08/14 14:58, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 11/08/14 14:48, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 01:10:12PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> On 08/08/14 17:37, Wei Liu wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>   	if (tx_evtchn == rx_evtchn) {
>>>>   		/* feature-split-event-channels == 0 */
>>>> @@ -687,6 +700,9 @@ void xenvif_disconnect(struct xenvif *vif)
>>>>   			queue->task = NULL;
>>>>   		}
>>>>   
>>>> +		wait_event(queue->inflight_wq,
>>>> +			   atomic_read(&queue->inflight_packets) == 0);
>>>
>>> Just make the dealloc task not stop unless it has deallocated all
>>> outstanding requests.  There's no need for another wait queue here.
>>>
>>
>> Are you suggesting something like
>>
>>    while (atomic_read(&queue->inflight_packets) !=0)
>>    	schedule_timeout(SOME_TIMEOUT);
> 
> No. That would be awful!
> 
> Add the test to the kthread itself:
> 
> int xenvif_dealloc_kthread(void *data)
> {
> 	struct xenvif_queue *queue = data;
> 
> 	while (atomic_read(&queue->inflight_packets) > 0
>                 || !kthread_should_stop()) {
>              [...]
> 
> etc.
> 
> Although, the main loop is a bit confused, so I suggest adding:
> 
> static bool xenvif_dealloc_thread_should_stop(struct xenvif_queue *q)
> {
>      /* Dealloc thread must remain running if there are any inflight
>       * packets so it can properly dealloc them when they complete.
>       */
>      return atomic_read(&queue->inflight_packets) == 0
>          && kthread_should_stop();
> }
> 
> And cleaning it up a bit (the while() could be a for(;;)).

I would recommend this:
---
@@ -2066,7 +2066,7 @@ int xenvif_dealloc_kthread(void *data)
 		wait_event_interruptible(queue->dealloc_wq,
 					 tx_dealloc_work_todo(queue) ||
 					 kthread_should_stop());
-		if (kthread_should_stop())
+		if (kthread_should_stop() && !atomic_read(&queue->inflight_packets))
 			break;
 
 		xenvif_tx_dealloc_action(queue);
---
If kthread_stop called, this will keep the main loop running until all callbacks are called.
Then it proceeds to the exit branch, otherwise doesn't disrupt normal operation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html