netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next 3/4] r8152: remove clear

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2014 02:12:48 +0000
From:	Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 3/4] r8152: remove clear_bp function

: Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 8:01 PM
> To: Hayes Wang; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: nic_swsd; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] r8152: remove clear_bp function
[...]
> >   	r8152b_disable_aldps(tp);
> >
> > -	rtl_clear_bp(tp);
> >
> 
>     Why leave 2 empty lines? One is enough.

The next patch would use another fucntion at the
same location. I skip removing the empty line and
re-adding it again. Is that better to do so? I would
resend the patches if the answer is yes.
 
Best Regards,
Hayes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html