netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: Header length compution function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 23 Aug 2014 12:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, amirv@...lanox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	ogerlitz@...lanox.com, yevgenyp@...lanox.com, idos@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: Header length compution function

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:34:22 -0700

> On 07/30/2014 06:39 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> I don't think my proposed patch is a bad trade off.  Where we have the
>> __skb_header_pointer() thing that takes preloaded pointers and header
>> length values.  It adds only one test which frankly should never
>> trigger and can be moved down into skb_copy_bits() or similar.
> 
> This works for me.  Once it is in I can see about pushing a patch to add
> some FCoE support and work on moving over igb and ixgbe.

You should be able to do this against net-next now, just FYI.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html