netdev - Re: [PATCH] rose: use %*ph specifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 05 Sep 2014 21:23:40 +0400
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rose: use %*ph specifier

On 09/05/2014 07:01 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> Instead of dereference each byte let's use %*ph specifier in the printk()
> calls.

> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>   net/rose/rose_link.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

> diff --git a/net/rose/rose_link.c b/net/rose/rose_link.c
> index bc55142..ce60771 100644
> --- a/net/rose/rose_link.c
> +++ b/net/rose/rose_link.c
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ void rose_link_rx_restart(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rose_neigh *neigh, unsigne
>   		break;
>
>   	case ROSE_DIAGNOSTIC:
> -		printk(KERN_WARNING "ROSE: received diagnostic #%d - %02X %02X %02X\n", skb->data[3], skb->data[4], skb->data[5], skb->data[6]);
> +		pr_warn("ROSE: received diagnostic #%d - %4ph\n", skb->data + 3);

    Er, this doesn't seem right. The equivalent code would be:

		pr_warn("ROSE: received diagnostic #%d - %3ph\n", skb->data[3], skb->data + 4);

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html