netdev - Re: Compilation error on freshly pulled net-next?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:21:43 +0000
From:	"Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"rick.jones2@...com" <rick.jones2@...com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Compilation error on freshly pulled net-next?

On Sep 5, 2014, at 3:09 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 14:47:43 -0700
> 
>> Looks like someone slipped a J in there and confused things:
>> 
>>               + rtnl_port_size(dev, ext_filter_mask) /* IFLA_VF_PORTS +
>>               IFLA_PORT_SELF */J + rtnl_link_get_size(dev) /* IFLA_LINKINFO */
>>               + rtnl_link_get_af_size(dev) /* IFLA_AF_SPEC */
>> 
>> (hopefully my mail client won't have mangled things too badly)
>> 
>> What is odd though is a git diff after I've replaced that 'J' with a
>> return isn't giving me any output.
> 
> That doesn't exist in my tree.

Looks like data corruption to me. There is a one-bit difference between line-feed and J. Oh for more ECC-capable systems...

-- 
Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (842 bytes)