[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 05:59:13 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 07/15] net: sched: RCU cls_route
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 22:57 -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> RCUify the route classifier. For now however spinlock's are used to
> protect fastmap cache.
>
> The issue here is the fastmap may be read by one CPU while the
> cache is being updated by another. An array of pointers could be
> one possible solution.
Yep, this doesnt seem like an urgent issue anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
> ---
...
>
> static void route4_destroy(struct tcf_proto *tp)
> {
> - struct route4_head *head = tp->root;
> + struct route4_head *head = rtnl_dereference(tp->root);
> int h1, h2;
>
> if (head == NULL)
> @@ -266,28 +287,35 @@ static void route4_destroy(struct tcf_proto *tp)
> for (h1 = 0; h1 <= 256; h1++) {
> struct route4_bucket *b;
>
> - b = head->table[h1];
> + b = rtnl_dereference(head->table[h1]);
> if (b) {
> for (h2 = 0; h2 <= 32; h2++) {
> struct route4_filter *f;
>
> - while ((f = b->ht[h2]) != NULL) {
> - b->ht[h2] = f->next;
> - route4_delete_filter(tp, f);
> + while ((f = rtnl_dereference(b->ht[h2])) != NULL) {
> + struct route4_filter *next;
> +
> + next = rtnl_dereference(f->next);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(b->ht[h2], next);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(), or simply : b->ht[h2] = f->next;
> + call_rcu(&f->rcu, route4_delete_filter);
> }
> }
> - kfree(b);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(head->table[h1], NULL);
> + kfree_rcu(b, rcu);
> }
> }
> - kfree(head);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(tp->root, NULL);
> + kfree_rcu(head, rcu);
> }
>
> static int route4_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, unsigned long arg)
> {
> - struct route4_head *head = tp->root;
> - struct route4_filter **fp, *f = (struct route4_filter *)arg;
> - unsigned int h = 0;
> + struct route4_head *head = rtnl_dereference(tp->root);
> + struct route4_filter *f = (struct route4_filter *)arg;
> + struct route4_filter __rcu **fp;
> + struct route4_filter *nf;
> struct route4_bucket *b;
> + unsigned int h = 0;
> int i;
>
> if (!head || !f)
> @@ -296,27 +324,35 @@ static int route4_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, unsigned long arg)
> h = f->handle;
> b = f->bkt;
>
> - for (fp = &b->ht[from_hash(h >> 16)]; *fp; fp = &(*fp)->next) {
> - if (*fp == f) {
> - tcf_tree_lock(tp);
> + fp = &b->ht[from_hash(h >> 16)];
> + for (nf = rtnl_dereference(*fp); nf;
> + fp = &nf->next, nf = rtnl_dereference(*fp)) {
> + if (nf == f) {
> + /* unlink it */
> *fp = f->next;
Strange you left this without annotations, while rest of your patches
always use rcu_assign_pointer(*fp, rtnl_dereference(f->next)
Note that it is absolutely fine to use *fp = f->next;
;)
> - tcf_tree_unlock(tp);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists