| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:38:07 +0400
From: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryomov@...tank.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Sage Weil <sage@...tank.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ceph Development <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] ceph: Convert pr_warning to pr_warn
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> Use the more common pr_warn.
>
> Other miscellanea:
>
> o Coalesce formats
> o Realign arguments
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> ---
> net/ceph/ceph_common.c | 15 +++++++++------
> net/ceph/messenger.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> net/ceph/osd_client.c | 15 +++++++--------
> net/ceph/osdmap.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ceph/ceph_common.c b/net/ceph/ceph_common.c
> index 1675021..58fbfe1 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/ceph_common.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/ceph_common.c
> @@ -293,17 +293,20 @@ static int get_secret(struct ceph_crypto_key *dst, const char *name) {
> key_err = PTR_ERR(ukey);
> switch (key_err) {
> case -ENOKEY:
> - pr_warning("ceph: Mount failed due to key not found: %s\n", name);
> + pr_warn("ceph: Mount failed due to key not found: %s\n",
> + name);
> break;
> case -EKEYEXPIRED:
> - pr_warning("ceph: Mount failed due to expired key: %s\n", name);
> + pr_warn("ceph: Mount failed due to expired key: %s\n",
> + name);
> break;
> case -EKEYREVOKED:
> - pr_warning("ceph: Mount failed due to revoked key: %s\n", name);
> + pr_warn("ceph: Mount failed due to revoked key: %s\n",
> + name);
> break;
> default:
> - pr_warning("ceph: Mount failed due to unknown key error"
> - " %d: %s\n", key_err, name);
> + pr_warn("ceph: Mount failed due to unknown key error %d: %s\n",
> + key_err, name);
> }
> err = -EPERM;
> goto out;
> @@ -433,7 +436,7 @@ ceph_parse_options(char *options, const char *dev_name,
>
> /* misc */
> case Opt_osdtimeout:
> - pr_warning("ignoring deprecated osdtimeout option\n");
> + pr_warn("ignoring deprecated osdtimeout option\n");
> break;
> case Opt_osdkeepalivetimeout:
> opt->osd_keepalive_timeout = intval;
> diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger.c b/net/ceph/messenger.c
> index b2f571d..a7203be 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
> @@ -1937,11 +1937,11 @@ static int process_banner(struct ceph_connection *con)
> sizeof(con->peer_addr)) != 0 &&
> !(addr_is_blank(&con->actual_peer_addr.in_addr) &&
> con->actual_peer_addr.nonce == con->peer_addr.nonce)) {
> - pr_warning("wrong peer, want %s/%d, got %s/%d\n",
> - ceph_pr_addr(&con->peer_addr.in_addr),
> - (int)le32_to_cpu(con->peer_addr.nonce),
> - ceph_pr_addr(&con->actual_peer_addr.in_addr),
> - (int)le32_to_cpu(con->actual_peer_addr.nonce));
> + pr_warn("wrong peer, want %s/%d, got %s/%d\n",
> + ceph_pr_addr(&con->peer_addr.in_addr),
> + (int)le32_to_cpu(con->peer_addr.nonce),
> + ceph_pr_addr(&con->actual_peer_addr.in_addr),
> + (int)le32_to_cpu(con->actual_peer_addr.nonce));
> con->error_msg = "wrong peer at address";
> return -1;
> }
> @@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@ static int read_partial_message(struct ceph_connection *con)
>
> BUG_ON(!con->in_msg ^ skip);
> if (con->in_msg && data_len > con->in_msg->data_length) {
> - pr_warning("%s skipping long message (%u > %zd)\n",
> + pr_warn("%s skipping long message (%u > %zd)\n",
> __func__, data_len, con->in_msg->data_length);
> ceph_msg_put(con->in_msg);
> con->in_msg = NULL;
> @@ -2712,7 +2712,7 @@ static bool con_sock_closed(struct ceph_connection *con)
> CASE(OPEN);
> CASE(STANDBY);
> default:
> - pr_warning("%s con %p unrecognized state %lu\n",
> + pr_warn("%s con %p unrecognized state %lu\n",
> __func__, con, con->state);
> con->error_msg = "unrecognized con state";
> BUG();
> @@ -2828,8 +2828,9 @@ static void con_work(struct work_struct *work)
> */
> static void con_fault(struct ceph_connection *con)
> {
> - pr_warning("%s%lld %s %s\n", ENTITY_NAME(con->peer_name),
> - ceph_pr_addr(&con->peer_addr.in_addr), con->error_msg);
> + pr_warn("%s%lld %s %s\n",
> + ENTITY_NAME(con->peer_name),
> + ceph_pr_addr(&con->peer_addr.in_addr), con->error_msg);
Just wondering, why did you move ENITITY_NAME argument to the next
line? I see you are doing this pretty consistently. Is this a style
guideline or something?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists